Destruction or distraction : Différence entre versions
(Page créée avec « {{Book|developpeur=|auteur=Humius Acidinus|titre auteur=|date=|source=TES Online|commentaire=|resume=|sous titre=|auteurIRL=|dateIRL=|langue=EN}} It is popular, espec... ») |
m |
||
Ligne 8 : | Ligne 8 : | ||
[[fr:Destruction ou distraction]] | [[fr:Destruction ou distraction]] | ||
− | [[Catégorie: | + | [[Catégorie:Versions originales]] |
− |
Version actuelle datée du 25 février 2015 à 17:50
Original media : TES Online
By Humius Acidinus
It is popular, especially among young upstarts who wish to establish themselves as intellectual contenders, to dismiss the study of harnessing the destructive potential of magicka as crude or simplistic. Those who embrace this argument prefer to spend time researching obscure theoretical topics instead of the more practical applications of magic. In truth, these pedants accomplish little beyond writing tomes of their own to refute the postulations of their contemporaries, wasting their time arguing hypotheticals with no basis in practical magical study. They are so distracted trying to outwit one another in their imaginary field that they never produce substantial advancements. It is my conviction that this self-indulgent behavior obstructs progress (concrete gains such as spell discovery) in arcane studies. I do not deny that magic is deep and complex, and our understanding is far from complete. However, I question the value of arguments over theories with very little basis in observable phenomena before we fully grasp less complicated subjects. In my years of practice, I have found that studying manifestations of magicka that seem the simplest often provides the clearest look at the nature of magic. Without a complete understanding of what seems to be basic, how could anyone advance magic and bring benefit to practitioners and Tamriel at large? I implore you, reader, to take care that you do not fall into the category of the fruitless intellectual. |